Update on Membranous Nephropathy

U Penn established an annual one-day seminar in nephrology symposium. This year was titled “New Horizons in Nephrology: Updates in Glomerular Disease”.

Dr. Beck from Boston University gave the update on membranous nephropathy (MN). Previously, we discussed his article in the NEJM in detail, and today we will go over some key points and updates:

• 75% of MN is considered primary (idiopathic).
• IgG4 subclass is predominant in idiopathic MN.
• Anti-PLA2R is highly specific for primary MN
• Co-localization of PLA2R and IgG4 within immune deposits on biopsy.
• The majority of patients with primary MN have circulating autoantibodies against PLA2R.

There is a clear association of anti-PLA2R with disease activity.

- Positive in nephrotic state.

- Declines prior to the decrease in proteinuria.

- Absent in remission.

- Returns with (or prior to) relapse.

- Associated with recurrent MN

Methods of testing:

- Western blot

- Indirect immunofluorescence test

- ELISA : Will likely be the test of choice. Available in Europe, not yet in the US.

Treatment:

- Do NOT use corticosteroid monotherapy or MMF monotherapy for initial therapy of MN.

- No single definitive immunosuppression could be easily identified.

Current Initial therapy :

• Ponticelli regimen: methylprednisolone 1g/d iv x 3 doses followed by oral prednisone 0.5mg/kg/d in months 1,3,5; oral cyclophosphamide (2mg/kg/d) in months 2,4,6.
• Alternative initial therapy for those who refuse or have contraindications to cyclophosphamide is Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) for at least 6 months.
• Stop if no remission in 6 months.
• If remission is attained, reduce dose every 1-2 mo by 50% and continue for at least 12 months 

Posted by Tarek Alhamad

Does nephrology need personalized medicine?

Systems biology is one of science’s growth areas. Sequencing technologies and software tools developed on the back of the human genome project have reduced the cost of, and therefore increased access to, large and complex datasets (ending in -ome) of genome sequences (genomics), gene expression (transcriptomics) and proteins and metabolites (proteomics and metabolomics). Systems biological techniques integrate these datasets and provide insights into how phenotypes may emerge from interacting biological processes rather than isolated genes or proteins.

A recent editorial in the journal Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation examined this field in general and its relevance to nephrology. The authors mention that –omic datasets have been useful in modeling “self-organized highly interconnected networks”, and that such networks have implicated unexpected candidates in disease pathogenesis (see for example, this paper on cardiac hypertrophy). 

The review goes on to suggest that using the tools of systems biology to finely phenotype individuals will usher in an era of truly personalized medicine. However, it is not clear to me that a definite sequel to this type of analysis will be the personalization of treatment or even that the concept of personalized medicine is particularly suited to our current view of what constitutes clinical evidence.

Diseases such as the ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV) are now known to exhibit genomic variability. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in AAV (such as here and here) have been hampered by: 

1. Short follow-up times 
2. Inter-group heterogeneity which may have affected outcomes. These factors have contributed to ongoing debate about the applicability of the results of these trials (see correspondence here). 
3. Additionally a recent trial in membranous nephropathy, likely to represent another disease with distinct –omic subsets, was marked by slow recruitment. 

 

All these points together suggest that it may be difficult to conduct meaningful clinical studies of distinct –omic subtypes in nephrological diseases. Currently, primacy is given to RCTs when evaluating the efficacy of new treatments; and in nephrology the community is finally beginning to produce the RCTs which have been absent historically. 

If the focus is to switch away from RCTs with their large, well-matched study groups and towards splitting groups up by some -omic fingerprint I am able to envisage a time when one has to choose between giving more credence to the results of larger, “non-personalised” trials or smaller studies featuring –omic data but lacking the controlled element of RCTs.  Would this represent progress?

Image of the Month

A man in his early 60s was being treated for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung for 2 years. Recently, he had  been complaining of increasing hemoptysis and a PET CT was performed which showed progression of his disease. He presented to the ED with general malaise, edema and abdominal bloating. His creatinine had increased from a baseline of 1.0 to 1.5mg/dl and he had >10g urinary protein daily. A renal biopsy was performed. Light microscopy revealed thickened basement membranes with some double-contour formation but no definite "spikes" Immunofluorescence showed dense granular staining for IgG along the capillary loops with some minor staining in the mesangium. The diagnosis was early secondary membranous glomerulopathy most likely related to the progression of his malignancy. An EM image is shown below (Click to enlarge)

Subepithelial deposits typical of membranous nephropathy are easily seen in the image (A). The overlying podocytes are damaged and the foot processes are effaced. The lower part of the image (B) shows an area at the junction of the capillary loop and the mesangium. Here, a deposit is also present but it appears that the overlying glomerular epithelium degenerated and is sloughing into the lumen. This is likely due to complement activation and the formation of membrane attack complexes induced by the presence of the deposits and is thought to be the cause of the severe proteinuria seen in this patient. It is important to note that this is not associated with inflammation because the complexes are out of the reach of inflammatory cells which is not the case where subendothelial deposits predominate. This case was not entirely typical because there were occasional subendothelial deposits noted throughout the glomerulus although they were few and their significance was uncertain. 


Thanks to Dr Bijol for the Image